Ideals over/under ideals #
This file concerns ideals lying over other ideals.
Let f : R →+* S be a ring homomorphism (typically a ring extension), I an ideal of R and
J an ideal of S. We say J lies over I (and I under J) if I is the f-preimage of J.
This is expressed here by writing I = J.comap f.
Implementation notes #
The proofs of the comap_ne_bot and comap_lt_comap families use an approach
specific for their situation: we construct an element in I.comap f from the
coefficients of a minimal polynomial.
Once mathlib has more material on the localization at a prime ideal, the results
can be proven using more general going-up/going-down theory.
Let P be an ideal in R[x]. The map
R[x]/P → (R / (P ∩ R))[x] / (P / (P ∩ R))
is injective.
The identity in this lemma asserts that the "obvious" square
R → (R / (P ∩ R))
↓ ↓
R[x] / P → (R / (P ∩ R))[x] / (P / (P ∩ R))
commutes. It is used, for instance, in the proof of quotient_mk_comp_C_is_integral_of_jacobson,
in the file RingTheory.Jacobson.
This technical lemma asserts the existence of a polynomial p in an ideal P ⊂ R[x]
that is non-zero in the quotient R / (P ∩ R) [x]. The assumptions are equivalent to
P ≠ 0 and P ∩ R = (0).
If there is an injective map R/p → S/P such that following diagram commutes:
R → S
↓ ↓
R/p → S/P
then P lies over p.
If P lies over p, then R / p has a canonical map to S / P.
Equations
- Ideal.Quotient.algebraQuotientOfLEComap h = (Ideal.quotientMap P f h).toAlgebra
Instances For
R / p has a canonical map to S / pS.
Equations
- Ideal.Quotient.algebraQuotientMapQuotient = Ideal.Quotient.algebraQuotientOfLEComap ⋯
Equations
- ⋯ = ⋯
Equations
- ⋯ = ⋯
comap (algebraMap R S) is a surjection from the prime spec of R to prime spec of S.
hP : (algebraMap R S).ker ≤ P is a slight generalization of the extension being injective
More general going-up theorem than exists_ideal_over_prime_of_isIntegral_of_isDomain.
TODO: Version of going-up theorem with arbitrary length chains (by induction on this)?
Not sure how best to write an ascending chain in Lean
comap (algebraMap R S) is a surjection from the max spec of S to max spec of R.
hP : (algebraMap R S).ker ≤ P is a slight generalization of the extension being injective
The ideal obtained by pulling back the ideal P from B to A.
Equations
- Ideal.under A P = Ideal.comap (algebraMap A B) P
Instances For
Equations
- ⋯ = ⋯
P lies over p if p is the preimage of P of the algebraMap.
- over : p = Ideal.under A P
Instances
Equations
- ⋯ = ⋯
Equations
- ⋯ = ⋯
Equations
- ⋯ = ⋯
Equations
- ⋯ = ⋯
B ⧸ P is a finite A ⧸ p-module if B is a finite A-module.
Equations
- ⋯ = ⋯
B ⧸ P is a finitely generated A ⧸ p-algebra if B is a finitely generated A-algebra.
Equations
- ⋯ = ⋯
B ⧸ P is a Noetherian A ⧸ p-module if B is a Noetherian A-module.
Equations
- ⋯ = ⋯
An A ⧸ p-algebra isomorphism between B ⧸ P and C ⧸ Q induced by an A-algebra
isomorphism between B and C, where Q = σ P.
Equations
- Ideal.Quotient.algEquivOfEqMap p σ h = { toEquiv := (P.quotientEquiv Q (↑σ) h).toEquiv, map_mul' := ⋯, map_add' := ⋯, commutes' := ⋯ }
Instances For
An A ⧸ p-algebra isomorphism between B ⧸ P and C ⧸ Q induced by an A-algebra
isomorphism between B and C, where P = σ⁻¹ Q.
Equations
Instances For
If P lies over p, then the stabilizer of P acts on the extension (B ⧸ P) / (A ⧸ p).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
If B is an integral A-algebra, P is a maximal ideal of B, then the pull back of
P is also a maximal ideal of A.
Equations
- ⋯ = ⋯
B ⧸ P is an integral A ⧸ p-algebra if B is a integral A-algebra.
Equations
- ⋯ = ⋯